John Cage: Impossible Futures
Brisbane composer LAWRENCE ENGLISH marks the centenary of John Cage’s birth with an essay, an album and even a mesostic poem in the manner of Cage.
John Cage is a potent virus. By this I mean he is as infectious as he is subtle. Like a virus, an interest in Cage starts with some symptoms and before long changes the host in a lasting way, changing the very DNA and ideological viewpoint from which the person infected by Cage is coming.
The only example I can give is my own growing Cage infection. Interestingly, I can't recall exactly where it was I first heard about John Cage. There may have been the odd early teenage encounter, but nothing discretely memorable. The closest it comes is a recollection of a music teacher denouncing Cage somewhere along the way. This same music teacher failed me in music, actually, and was shocked to discover I had chosen to create a living in music during a chance post-school encounter. Whatever that first spore was, something at the time must have taken root inside me, as I am sure it has in so many other musicians of the past 70 years.
What I can say for sure is that I have had a folder on my desktop for the better part of a few years now with one of his quotes sitting in its caption: “If you celebrate it, it's art. If you don't, it isn't.” John Cage, 1966. That particular saying – along with a swag of other golden gems, like “Every something is an echo of nothing” and “I have nothing to say and I am saying it and that is poetry” – are also like viruses, in that they seem innocuous when you first come across them but gradually they chip away at your mental health, causing you to come down with a case of Cagian fever.
all Wonder
Engaging us
in Moments
in tIme
in Space
in Silence
mr John cage
yOu are still breathing
Hiding in us
Nothings whisper
For those who don't know him, please allow me to introduce John Cage, who celebrates the centenary of his birth this year. Cage was a true renaissance man – a composer, painter, philosopher, mycologist and above all a lover of turning things on their heads. What makes John Cage such a central figure is he was restless in a century where restlessness could honestly result in substantive change and the reconfiguring of long-established traditions and ideas. Along with great mid-century thinkers like Marshall McLuhan and Buckminster Fuller, Cage’s contributions are still continuing to be felt – in some cases more acutely than ever.
Many people will recognise Cage for his most famous composition of 1952, 4’33’’. In this work, the performer (at the piano) remains intentionally silent and does not perform. Through the absence of action, the audience becomes aware of all the sound around them and, in doing so, are pushed to consider silence. It’s works like this, and his works concerning chance, that resonate far beyond the music itself (or the lack thereof).
Last year, when thinking about Cage’s upcoming centenary, I was trying to imagine a way in which I might publicly tip my hat to the old man. I’d heard of a lot of great projects – a collaborator and friend, Werner Dafeldecker, had decided to re-stage Cage’s classic octophonic work Williams Mix alongside Valerio Triciloi, whilst another friend was planning performances of works that have never been presented in Australia. These projects weren’t a fit for what Cage represented to me.
By chance (pun intended) I was reminded of Cage’s only excursion into film, One11, when Stephan Mathieu happened to post a reference to the film on his Facebook page. (Yes, even the great digital suburb that is Facebook can contribute to creative endeavours.) It was this chance encounter that lead to my creating For/Not For John Cage, my tribute of sorts to his methodologies and legacy.
The film One11, which was completed just one week before Cage died, is something of an understated affair. A terrifically Cagian examination of minimalism, in the form of a single light source filmed as it moves and flickers around a studio space. It sounds deceptively simple, a light moving, but somehow Cage managed to capture something so utterly pure in this piece that it perhaps is one of his most powerful works. It just exists in and of itself, and asks you to come to it – it’s down to the audience members what they draw from it. It’s an invitation to examine: do so, and be rewarded; don’t, and come away unmoved from your fixed position.
At a personal level, the greatest thing Cage has left behind is an invitation to unhinge yourself from tradition. As I am making sound works that were technologically impossible for much of the last century, and early in that century likely to be heard as the expressions of lunacy, I owe a debt of gratitude to Cage. With that charming smile of his, he turned quirk into quandary and then, again smiling all the while, into art.
As I look around now, I wonder where is the Cage of this age? In the 20th century we were spoilt with outspoken minds – William Burroughs, Susan Sontag, Neil Postman, Chris Marker and of course John Cage – all committed to undermining the establishment, for want of a better word. Today the legacy of these minds seems more vital and inspirational than ever. The question for us is how we live up to the possible futures they have imagined for our generation and, more importantly, how we imagine impossible futures for those who come after us.
+
Great article. Cage was a touchstone for me when I started getting into music. I was always fascinated at how engaging something almost wholly random in construction could be. Three Constructions by the Donald Knaack Percussion Ensemble is a strange and fascinating album, too.
Boulez thought cage a dickhead.
Awesome article and great music from Mr English. More please!
Cage probably was a dickhead. But who cares? Lou Reed, Al Green, Brian Ferry, most of the Beach Boys, all the Beatles except maybe Ringo, the Rolling Stones except for Keith, every jazz musician that chose hard drugs, the Gallagher brothers, Charles Mingus - dickheads all.
Why did you have to bring dickheads into this?
Blame it on Bowie.
Or Bowie fans.
God I hope it's actually Bowie posting. It seems like something he would do.
Find it hard to believe you are so unfamiliar with Matt Church, but anyway.
Not even sure who you're talking to at this point.
You.
I upset a lot of people at uni by getting good grades without knowing who Adorno and Zizek were, if that's what you mean.
Honestly all you need is a copy of Labyrinths, a copy of Heart of Darkness, access to JSTOR, a refusal to read James Joyce, and hope.
Um, no, that's not what I mean. Matt Church is not exactly Heidegger.
From what I can tell, Heidegger was largely unnecessary and mostly just a flatulent git.
I still don't care who Matt Church is.
''WoOOoooOOOO let us see how many times we can disguise the fact that we are all using the same logical processes to reach differing conclusions a-wooOOOoooOOOOoooOOOO!''.
''The empirical method threatens our livelihoods wooooOOOOOooOOOOoooOOOOO!!!!''
Honestly from what I can tell a lot of that philosophy was designed to put a stake through the heart of pointless questions and that's about all I need to know.
Just listen to the Mahabharata on audio tape. It's basically like listening to John Cage and Heidegger fight a war with magic anyway.
''What makes John Cage such a central figure is he was restless in a century where restlessness could honestly result in substantive change and the reconfiguring of long-established traditions and ideas.''
I always admire Lawrence's writing, and this particular insight really caught my attention. I think the implication is that restlessness in this century can easily be wasted on a debilitating cycle of online fappery?
Milhaud.
As far as cage vs Boulez. aleatoric music/ serialism vs indeterminacy circa 59'...
Just read this article. Beautifully said and artfully considered, as always, LE - especially the closing paragraph. Cage looms large in my imagination too.
Just got around to reading this..a really nice personal take and intoduction to the man. As someone who's only just beginning to become a bit more intellectual about what I do, I feelIve definitely caught Cagian fever, not to mention developing a great appreciation of some of the other names dropped (mcluhan, fuller, marker) too.
Here ya go. Here's an analogy about cage and the the minimalists pre post modernism
Say ya heading down the highway and you see a road called Milhaud ave and you go down that road but it's too bumpy and ya suspension is bouncing and it's rough and tough on ya ole brain and body so what you do is take minimalist crescent that runs off Milhaud ave but as you sweep round the crescent admiring the sleek white concrete aluminum and glass homes with palm trees out the front you realize that your being distracted and the developer run out of money and all of a sudden you get to the end of the road and it stops in q court and the sign says wrong way go back. So whaddaya do? Well you go back to Milhaud ave and continue down that road and halfway down you see some dudes sitting on the side of the road drinking something from a brown back like in the olden days and you pull over have a swig get ya stamina back and ask for directions. Now this old dude says man just keep on going down Milhaud ave man just go right to the end, don't get off just man do ALL the way down it.
You might ask ''Why?'', but that's rather Regressionist. Better to be progressive, and ask ''Why not?''